Author: John Warfield
Date: 21:27:39 12/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 1999 at 23:25:24, hgkjhg wrote: >Why don't you learn to play chess without using rebel. In the endgame, no >program would've beat an im. Nf5 was a mistake. It doesn't says that much >about rebel's game (it's not necessarily bad), but all these gm challenges are >kind of pathetic. Russek got a lost position after less than 15 moves twice in >a row. Most of the drawn games didn't show much fighting or skills from either >opponent because of the book. Rebel's opponents should get nothing for a draw, >but a lot more for a win. >And is your uscf rating something like 100? >oh, and happy new year Iv'e already learned chess without the use of rebel or any other program, so your basically talking out your ass. Sorry but I am not responsible for your inability to read and comprehend, I never said rebel plays bad chess, infact I have praised rebel on more than one occasion at this forum. What I said was that Rebel's endgame is "suspect", meaning that it has been known to make Questionable moves in the Endgame. This is not the same as saying rebel is a bad program or that I cannot learn from it, apparently you have invented in your imagination that I think badly of rebel. As to your comments concerning my rating,I wonder where you get a rating of 100 for me?, since i am not listed in the uscf? Lastly I think it is Rediculous to insult a person then wish them a happy New year don't you?? Please learn some self control or don't respond obnoxiously to my post.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.