Author: John Warfield
Date: 22:53:24 12/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 1999 at 01:42:05, Charles Unruh wrote: >Are you from chessbase trying to get people to stop buying rebel hahaahahah :)! > >> No I just think that the athlon may be over-rated? Just so happens that Rebel was the victim this time, but it looks like Nimzo-99 is next as I am ahead 2-0 of the six game match, I am using fritz5.32 AMD 350 against Nimzo-99 Athlon 800. Looks like Dan Corbit's above response is starting to make alot of sense. >> >> How is it possible for Hiarcs 7.0 running on a Amd K6-350 to defeat Rebel >>Century running on a Athlon 800 in a six game match 4-3 ?? the extra game was >>from the tie break. I decided based on this match that I am not in any big >>hurry to upgrade to a faster computer. What's surprising is that I was playing >>hiarcs without the full hashtables, in windows 98 at 136k. Time control was >>game in 30. I do not believe that this match means that hiarcs7 is stronger than >>Rebel at all. I am just surprised that a machine that fast would not have >>murdered me in the match. Rebel Century is still the best program available >>IMHO. If anyone shows interest I will Post the full match.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.