Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Alpha-Beta-Conspiracy Search (it is not Conspiracy-Number Search!)

Author: Dan Andersson

Date: 08:27:28 12/31/99

Go up one level in this thread

Yes, I used it together w. MTD(f), to lessen the number of re-searches. Now I
use a similar method w. MTD(f) based on dynamic criteria that I glean from my
IID search, instead of the 'objective' measure of number of moves. There is an
overhead in generating the number of legal moves in a position. If you do that
in nodes leading to Leaf nodes you will find it slowing your search
considerably, and you can not be certain if they are or not in ABC-Search.

Regards Dan Andersson

• Re: Alpha-Beta-Conspiracy Search (it is not Conspiracy-Number Search!) Alessandro Damiani 12:26:48 12/31/99
  • Re: Alpha-Beta-Conspiracy Search (it is not Conspiracy-Number Search!) Dan Andersson 13:39:08 12/31/99
    • Re: Alpha-Beta-Conspiracy Search (it is not Conspiracy-Number Search!) Alessandro Damiani 14:34:40 01/01/00
      • Re: Alpha-Beta-Conspiracy Search (it is not Conspiracy-Number Search!) Dan Andersson 14:52:13 01/01/00
        • Re: Alpha-Beta-Conspiracy Search (it is not Conspiracy-Number Search!) Alessandro Damiani 15:33:38 01/01/00
          • Re: Alpha-Beta-Conspiracy Search (it is not Conspiracy-Number Search!) Dan Andersson 16:02:38 01/01/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.