Author: blass uri
Date: 00:18:34 01/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 1999 at 17:48:04, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >On December 30, 1999 at 23:25:24, hgkjhg wrote: > >>Why don't you learn to play chess without using rebel. In the endgame, no >>program would've beat an im. Nf5 was a mistake. It doesn't says that much >>about rebel's game (it's not necessarily bad), but all these gm challenges are >>kind of pathetic. Russek got a lost position after less than 15 moves twice in >>a row. Most of the drawn games didn't show much fighting or skills from either >>opponent because of the book. Rebel's opponents should get nothing for a draw, >>but a lot more for a win. >>And is your uscf rating something like 100? >>oh, and happy new year > >Nf5 was not a mistake, it was played because of strong anti-GM on, and the >program got 4 pawns for a piece I think this move was VERY playable and it >made the game a very difficult one! if the sac didnt happen mabey the game would >have ended up similar who knows but the cramping effect Nxf5 had tests a persons >defensive skills for sure! It was not played because of anti GM. Renel plays after few minutes Nf5 without anti GM Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.