Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 15:29:04 01/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 1999 at 10:11:02, paul bedrey wrote:
>On December 31, 1999 at 00:13:09, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On December 30, 1999 at 22:51:14, John Warfield wrote:
>>
>>>>BTW I'm wondering if the LCT-II test is still accurate or not. I suppose it is not? Somebody has data? I think Shep has run the test with the new programs, but I have not checked if the ratings were close to the SSDF ratings.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>
>Hi Christophe,
>
> I have found the following LCT-II test results on the internet.
>
> PIII-450 PIII-550
>
> Chess Tiger 12.0 2655
> Hiarcs 7.32 2655
> Nimzo 7.32 2565
> Junior 5.0 2565 2560
> Fritz 5.32 2525
> Crafty 17.04 2530
>
>
>I,ve done of my own LCT-II testing on my K6-2 475 and my results correlate well
>with the above results for Hiarcs,Nimzo,Junior and Fritz. I also have a P-90 and
>my results were in line with the SSDF list. There does seem to be a divergance
>between LCTII and SSDF list for sum programs on new machines.
>The big surprise is Fritz well over 100 PTs different from SSDF.
>
> The problem I see with test sets is that they are not benchmarked to humans(at
>least I haven't seen any) and that each problem is weighted the same. Of course
>there also is usually not enough problems too. Having said that my favorite is
>the LCT-II and I am hoping a LCTIII comes out.
>
> Paul
These results are a confirmation that the LCT-II test is not valid anymore.
Thanks for the data.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.