Author: blass uri
Date: 02:43:52 01/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2000 at 05:02:45, ed wrote: >Hi all, > >Am wondering if there is any benchmark for which CPU tiger favors. Also, is >there a big diff between a K6-2 and K6-3 at same mhz for tiger? (for rebel I >believe the speedup is 20%.) I read that rebel like the pentiumIII more than tiger. > >Is tiger considered a knowledge pgm like rebel? The definition of knowledge is not clear to me. I often find that fast searchers have better positional understanding. I think the best way to check knowledge is to look only at games when every program "believe" for many moves that it stands better(it is better to look at slow time control to reduce the affect of tactical mistakes). If a weaker(or at least not stronger) program has better result in these games then it is a clear evidence that it has better positional understanding. The opposite is not truth because the stronger program can have more than 50% because of tactical mistakes of the weaker program. I do not know about results of this test so I have no idea which program has better knowledge. what style of play does it have? >is tiger better with humans too? is tiger's best at blitz or slow chess? how >does it do at defending compared to the best (shredder4!?) and end games >(hiarcs732!?) Why do you think that shredder4 is best at defending and that hiarcs732 is best at endgames? >Is it's nps more like hiarcs or fritz? I read that the number of nps is something like half of the number of fritz. Uri
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.