Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 03:29:43 01/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2000 at 05:43:52, blass uri wrote: >On January 02, 2000 at 05:02:45, ed wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>Am wondering if there is any benchmark for which CPU tiger favors. Also, is >>there a big diff between a K6-2 and K6-3 at same mhz for tiger? (for rebel I >>believe the speedup is 20%.) > >I read that rebel like the pentiumIII more than tiger. > >> >>Is tiger considered a knowledge pgm like rebel? > >The definition of knowledge is not clear to me. >I often find that fast searchers have better positional understanding. I am reading here the biggest crap out of history. >I think the best way to check knowledge is to look only at games when every >program "believe" for many moves that it stands better(it is better to look at >slow time control to reduce the affect of tactical mistakes). > > > >If a weaker(or at least not stronger) program has better result in these games >then it is a clear evidence that it has better positional understanding. > >The opposite is not truth because the stronger program can have more than 50% >because of tactical mistakes of the weaker program. > >I do not know about results of this test so I have no idea which program has >better knowledge. > > what style of play does it have? >>is tiger better with humans too? is tiger's best at blitz or slow chess? how >>does it do at defending compared to the best (shredder4!?) and end games >>(hiarcs732!?) > >Why do you think that shredder4 is best at defending and that hiarcs732 is best >at endgames? > >>Is it's nps more like hiarcs or fritz? > >I read that the number of nps is something like half of the number of fritz. > > > >Uri
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.