Author: stuart taylor
Date: 03:40:16 01/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2000 at 05:34:49, Mark Young wrote:
>On January 02, 2000 at 03:23:34, Oles Girniak wrote:
>
>>May be someone already run them in the few test positions. And can tell
>>something about diff between them.
>> Thank you.
>
>Fritz 6 looks to be stronger. This may be due to Fritz 6 having a bit more
>understanding of some endgame positions, and the use of the tablebase in its
>search. This is only an off the cuff judgement from watching some of the games.
>I should know more shortly now that the Y2K computer scare is over, and my boss
>stops working me 80+ hours a week updating his computer systems.
>
>Right now I have Fritz 6 playing a match with Hiarcs 7.32 at 40/2. Fritz 6 is
>winning the match after 6 games by +1 -0 =5.
>
>(My current rating list for all games played from G/5 to 40/2hrs.)
>
>* all programs play using their own book.
>
>* all programs without their own native book play using their own exclusive copy
>of Junior 5's book.
>
>1 Fritz 6 2512 181
>2 Fritz 5.32 2499 119
>3 Junior 5.0 2487 156
>4 Hiarcs 7.32 2476 139
>5 Crafty 16.18 2475 114
>6 Fritz 5.00/16Bit 2465 78
>7 Crafty 16.15 2461 54
>8 Crafty 16.13 2440 63
>9 Crafty 16.6 2438 76
>10 Hiarcs 4.0 2430 61
>11 Crafty 17.04 2424 65
>12 Hiarcs 6.0 2382 74
>13 Crafty 15.18 2373 55
>14 Comet B10 2349 61
>15 Comet B11 2337 42
>16 Comet B02 2315 56
>17 Doctor? 3.0 2232 56
>18 EXchess 2.51 2064 66
How can hiarcs 6 possibly come so low down on your list? Even alot less
than hiarcs 4?
And is k6-3 clearly better than k6-2?
And is Rebel realy that bad with amd? What's wrong?
And is there any point in upgrading to Athlon? Or other? (I have k6-3 400mhz
and I'm waiting to see which is strongest program, or which two.
Might it not be Rebel Centuary)?
Thanks!
Stuart Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.