Author: Frederic Friedel
Date: 03:52:40 01/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2000 at 06:13:00, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >Posting great results of F6.x engines can be interpreted as marketing. But is >there anything wrong about it? Everyone does, one way or another. I posted >results of several beta engines, including Tiger during the last months, and I >was not the only one. My purpose had nothing to to with marketing, but some >people interpreted it this way. Big deal. Others publicize a "world >championship" obtained after a 7 or 11 round Swiss tournament, as if such a >title would mean they are best, etc. etc. etc. > >What's so strange about marketing being done by companies that put a product in >the market? Did ChessBase really post results of the F6.x engine? I must have missed that :-(
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.