Author: Mark Young
Date: 08:06:13 01/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2000 at 07:37:45, blass uri wrote: >On January 02, 2000 at 06:40:16, stuart taylor wrote: > > ><snipped> >>How can hiarcs 6 possibly come so low down on your list? Even alot less >>than hiarcs 4? > >Simply because the number of games is too small. > >Uri I don't think that is the problem. I think the problem is Hiarcs 6 is a weak program at fast time controls. This is a problem I noted when Hiarcs 6 hit the market. Hiarcs 6 rating will jump on this list as I play more games at longer time controls. As of now most of the game were played at a fast time control.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.