Author: José Carlos
Date: 08:43:34 01/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2000 at 10:37:54, Torstein Hall wrote: >On January 02, 2000 at 06:47:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On January 02, 2000 at 03:23:34, Oles Girniak wrote: >> >>>May be someone already run them in the few test positions. And can tell >>>something about diff between them. >>> Thank you. >> >>When i run some tests on Fritz6 i feel it's searching in a more >>reliable way than Fritz5. Evaluation is the same, but tuned about >>0.25 pawn more aggressive on average. >> >>Equipped with the new book it scores a lot better, i don't doubt that. >> >>So basically it's the same program where tuning/search has been tuned >>a bit. This is however true for all fritz versions since fritz3, so >>if we take into mind the small differences between version 3 to 5 >>then it's definitely a step forward from 5.32 to 6. >> >>Vincent > >I think the NPS rate is a bit lower on F6 than on F5.32 so perhaps there is some >new evaluation in the program!? > Of course less NPS can mean more evaluation work, but not necessaryly. Less NPS can be due to many other "internal work" of the program, for example on move ordering or something else. José C. >And it feels stronger to me. Spesially the engame handling in F6 looks like a >real winner!! > >Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.