Author: Georg Langrath
Date: 12:05:06 01/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
Is it not very strange that Tiger is better than Rebel in computer-computer matches. And to make a selection which programs that shall be allowed to partcipate in SSDF-list is smart but not criminal. Don't forget that it is not a game for Ed and his friends in the Rebel company to make best propaganda for his programs. It is sooner a question about to live or die in their work. I would have done the same as Ed if I had been smart enough. And he is smart. But that is not the same thing as to be dishonest. And his initiative to let Rebel play against Grandmasters was very courageous. If Rebel had lost enough games it had been goodbye for Rebel in the market. Don't judge him until you have walked in his shoes. Georg On January 02, 2000 at 11:03:13, Bango wrote: >Hello group, > >I was wondering why Mr. Schroder pulled his Rebel program from the SSDF list and >yet he is promoting his Rebel/Tiger program now that it is on top of the list. > >It seems Mr. Schroder is in a dilemma where he has previously stated that the >SSDF cheated by allowing Fritz certain advantages, but now, as it is to his >financial gain claims the title as computer chess barn boss. His website is >actually promoting the SSDF now !! > >Does the group think this is a reflection of Mr. Schoder's character ?? > >I would suggest as a protest to refuse to purchase Rebel/Tiger !! > >Comments welcome, > >Bango123
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.