Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 15:42:31 01/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
Hi On January 03, 2000 at 18:24:21, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On January 03, 2000 at 16:52:21, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >[snip] >> #q=19291 [1%] // #(quiescense-nodes# > >Wow...does *my* chessprogram have a problem or is this very few ? Nope, it was a copy/paste error on my side. Actually the 19291 nodes are 11% of all nodes, not 1%. >> #fhs=27982 [55%] // #positions where I get a fail-high (FH) >> #fh1s=23591 [47%] // #positions where the FH occurs after the 1st move >[..] >>As you can see, the percentage on fail-highs after the 1st move, are *far* >>away from the 90%... > >23591/27982 = 84% Aha! Thats was my fault then. I divided it with the number of positions a search was applied to. [ Of course it would be also a good idea to increase this percentage, but that's a different subject then. ] Thanks for pointing out my mistake! >Not that bad...I'm getting about the same values...I don't think you >can get much higher without SEE. I'll give SEE a more careful look as soon as I have the time. :) Kind regards, -sargon
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.