Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 17:39:05 01/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2000 at 10:22:31, Harald Faber wrote: >On January 03, 2000 at 07:48:16, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On January 03, 2000 at 04:48:21, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On January 03, 2000 at 04:19:36, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On January 03, 2000 at 03:41:36, Michael Cummings wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 03, 2000 at 03:15:29, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Bottom line: This Christophe is quite a guy. Coming from nowhere his >>>>>>program enters the list on no.1. When was the last time you did see >>>>>>such an event to happen? >>>>> >>>>>Do you not remember CM6K. Chess Tiger already proved strong in other games >>>>>played for a while now before it made its debute on the SSDF >>>>> >>>>>I think CM6K made the biggest surprise when it topped the SSDF, and if you look >>>>>at the 200MMX machines still remains No1. >>>>> >>>>>CM6K is the true KING >>>> >>>>In the SSDF list CM6K is 1 point ahead of F532 on P200MMX. Tiger is 25 points >>>>ahead of F532 on AMD-450s. >>>> >>>>CM6K is very strong, but Tiger tops the list no matter how you look at it. >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>Mike does not deny it. He just points out that within the 200MMX pool CM6k is >>>the strongest and it might be that if tested on 450MHz it could be no.1 again. >>> >>>And +1 or +25 means really NOTHING with the margin of error. >>> >>>For me at least within a range of 50 pts the progs are equal strong. >> >>Enrique should know better than to compare program strength like that when >>played on faster hardware. >> >>I have heard many times that programs play better with certain processors. So in >>that case we can already say that CM6K will be better than Fritz on the 450 >>machines since it is ahead of the rest on the 200MMX machines. >> >>How do we know that CM6K playing in a 450 machine will not play like a super GM >>and kill all other programs. We have already seen from games posted on here that >>CM6K has beaten Tiger is a series of games on hardware faster than the SSDF >>200MMX machines. >> >>But the fact remains and that is all I am stating, that CM6K is No1 on the >>200MMX machines. > > >We can repeat it again and again, maybe Enrique understands it someday. ;-) > > >>One note, has anyone bothered to test tiger on the 200MMX machines to see if the >>program is way ahead of the field, or just performs better on 450 machines. > > >It was tested on P90 and was ahead of CM5000, but it was the time they changed >to 450MHz so no need to take 200MHz for Tiger. The reason why it would be good to see the results on the 200 machines, would be that Chris and many others think that this program on any machine would is way ahead of the rest. So if it was way ahead on the 200MMX then the result on the 450 machine would be back up better.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.