Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 19:18:51 01/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2000 at 21:44:26, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 03, 2000 at 19:14:03, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On January 02, 2000 at 11:25:31, Fernando Villegas wrote: >>[snip] >>>There is not such a dilemma as much as Ed IS NOT promoting HIS Rebel, but Tiger, >>>a different program even if his company will distribute it. I agree the name >>>Rebel-Tiger is deceiving, but there is nothing of Rebel into it. >> >>Why do you say that? Has Christophe Theron told you personally that he has >>learned nothing from his partnership with Ed? I have seen indications of the >>opposite. I have certainly seen Ed say that he has learned from Christophe on >>how to optimize a particular algorithm. I suspect that both tools have >>benefited from the exchange of information. > > >Yes, I don't understand why Fernando says that the name is deceiving. > >The Rebel-Tiger is exactly what is said: Chess Tiger with a lot of improvements >coming from Rebel. > > > Christophe It is easy to understand: the word rebel in the comb Rebel-Tiger is deceiving in the limited and specific sense that certain people, specially new one here in CCC, like the guy that posted about this issue, can think that Tiger is enterely an Ed Schroeder product as Century is. And it is not, right? It is your, Christophe, even if you, as Dan say and I agree, you and ed benefited and took some ideas from your partnership. So nothing wrong and "deceiving" with my explanation, or, if I am wrong, nothing purposely aimed to hurt nobody. Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.