Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 19:28:06 01/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2000 at 22:18:51, Fernando Villegas wrote: [snip] >It is easy to understand: the word rebel in the comb Rebel-Tiger is deceiving in >the limited and specific sense that certain people, specially new one here in >CCC, like the guy that posted about this issue, can think that Tiger is >enterely an Ed Schroeder product as Century is. And it is not, right? It is >your, Christophe, even if you, as Dan say and I agree, you and ed benefited and >took some ideas from your partnership. >So nothing wrong and "deceiving" with my explanation, or, if I am wrong, nothing >purposely aimed to hurt nobody. I think I see your meaning: People associate "Rebel" with Ed. So they may think that Ed wrote the entire package. I think the Rebel web site is pretty clear on the contributions of Christophe. Anyway, it should be generally known that all the major functionality of CT is from 'the other CT'. But Ed surely has given him some good ideas. On the other hand, I think that CT will benefit from the Rebel monicker, since it is well known. Having the 'Rebel' tag appended will mean instant market recognition. I think the whole idea is really a pretty good marketing idea, and should make both Ed and Christophe a lot of money.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.