Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 20:55:55 01/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2000 at 22:28:06, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On January 03, 2000 at 22:18:51, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>[snip]
>>It is easy to understand: the word rebel in the comb Rebel-Tiger is deceiving in
>>the limited and specific sense that certain people, specially new one here in
>>CCC, like the guy that posted about this issue, can think that Tiger is
>>enterely an Ed Schroeder product as Century is. And it is not, right? It is
>>your, Christophe, even if you, as Dan say and I agree, you and ed benefited and
>>took some ideas from your partnership.
>>So nothing wrong and "deceiving" with my explanation, or, if I am wrong, nothing
>>purposely aimed to hurt nobody.
>
>I think I see your meaning:
>People associate "Rebel" with Ed. So they may think that Ed wrote the entire
>package. I think the Rebel web site is pretty clear on the contributions of
>Christophe. Anyway, it should be generally known that all the major
>functionality of CT is from 'the other CT'. But Ed surely has given him some
>good ideas. On the other hand, I think that CT will benefit from the Rebel
>monicker, since it is well known. Having the 'Rebel' tag appended will mean
>instant market recognition. I think the whole idea is really a pretty good
>marketing idea, and should make both Ed and Christophe a lot of money.
You got it right, Dann.
We could also say that the Rebel family is simply expanding. After Rebel
6-7-8-9-10 and Century, here is the little brother: Rebel-Tiger.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.