Author: Marcus Kaestner
Date: 08:07:11 01/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
>ChessBits reprinted verbatim half of an article (introduction, chess commentary and >all) by Dr Nunn without his permission or the permission of the Vögel-Verlag >(publishers of CSS). The second half was announced for the subsequent issue. The nonsense! please don´t veil the truth! chessbits never reprinted half of the articel. there were 10 diagrams inside. chessbits only quoted two or three sentence of the main evaluation about the position. there were no special nunn analysis inside. so you really will pretend that the css-article is consisting out of 10 sentences? if that would be this way then i have to condole with you. sorry. >Vögel-Verlag, publishers of CSS, have paid Dr. Nunn for the unauthorised >reproduction of his article in ChessBits, since they are responsible for protecting his that is your version >rights. They seek reimbursement from ChessBits. The editors of CSS have spent >many hours over the past months in an effort to avert legal proceedings, which >would cost many thousands of marks, vs. a few hundred for the author of the article. >We will continue our efforts. dear frederic, please don´t turn the facts. who has spent many hours? who has driven 1250 kilometers for a meeting? who has written an article for css because of an agreement between you and me? and now you are speaking about efforts? maybe you mean effort in giving new "informations" to nunn or vögel to stir up the fire. frederic, you should be ashamed!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.