Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Russek -Rebel Match, Game 2

Author: Joshua Lee

Date: 12:05:37 01/04/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 04, 2000 at 08:00:08, Graham Laight wrote:

>On January 02, 2000 at 23:56:41, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>I agree too. But then agree to Bob's other statement on this issue too:
>>No program is near to 2600 at 40/2. I noticed a lot of people hoped that
>>and actually expected that for Rebel. We have to have a few more years
>>patience I fear before you see Rebel hitting 2600 but it will come as
>>the rating of about 2500 is more ore less a fact now and frankly I am
>>very pleased with that.
>
>On basis have you made the assertion that it will take a few more years for
>Rebel to hit 2600?
>
>Likewise, what's the evidence to support your belief that that Rebel (Century)
>is about 2500 human FIDE now?
>
Had Ed Schroder not played on anything other than the Kryoteck K6-3 600 Rebel's
Performance would've stayed above 2500. However I have heard that you subtract
180 points from a performance rating. If you were using a USCF or FIDE formula i
think you need over 20 or 30 games. Then you wouldn't have to subtract anything,
but i am not an expert this just makes sense.









>>Soon the Israeli League will start. 3 top programs will play at 40/2.
>>In May of this year when each program will have played 11 games we
>>will know a lot more.
>>
>>Ed
>
>By this time, there will be new versions of those programs out, and the
>information will be out of date. However, it will still be good to have more
>recent evidence than the 1997 Aegon tournament of the true strength of
>computers.
>
>-g



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.