Author: James Swafford
Date: 14:58:13 01/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
I suspect you're just trying to get the ball rolling here, and I don't blame you. I think it best, though, to mail in nominees to Steve. Just like last time, each nominee should have a week or so to accept or decline. Finally, place the accepting nominees on a ballot and put it to a vote. That aside, let me say "well done" to you, Bruce and KD. I know it's gotta be a thankless job, and you had a pretty long tenure. Thanks. :-) -- James On January 04, 2000 at 14:29:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >These are people I think would be good moderators. I probably forgot a bunch. >These are just the ones that occurred to me. You can consider these as >nominations: > Albert Silver > Andreas Schwartmann > Bertil Eklund > blass uri > Bruce Moreland (I suspect that Bruce needs a break...) > Côme > Charles Milton Ling > Chessfun > Dan Andersson > Didzis Cirulis > Enrique Irazoqui > Ernst A. Heinz > Eugene Nalimov > Fernando Villegas > Frank Quisinsky > Harald Faber > Howard Exner > James Robertson > James T. Walker > Jon Dart > José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba > Jouni Uski > KarinsDad > Laurence Chen > Lawrence S. Tamarkin > Michael Cummings > Michel Langeveld > Pete Galati > Peter McKenzie > Rajen Gupta > Richard A. Fowell > Shep > Stephen A. Boak > Steve Lopez > Tina Long > Tony Hedlund > Ulrich Tuerke > Will Singleton > >These are about as controversial as I am, but far more knowlegeable and >therefore excellent choices also: > Amir Ban > Christophe Theron > Ed Schröder > Robert Hyatt > Tom Kerrigan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.