Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:09:27 01/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2000 at 17:58:13, James Swafford wrote: >I suspect you're just trying to get the ball rolling >here, and I don't blame you. I think it best, though, >to mail in nominees to Steve. Doesn't someone need to second them? It seems to me a bit of discussion of the topic might be good. >Just like last time, each nominee should have a >week or so to accept or decline. Finally, place >the accepting nominees on a ballot and put it >to a vote. Whatever the procedure was last time should be fine. I don't recall exactly how the whole thing went step by step. >That aside, let me say "well done" to you, >Bruce and KD. I know it's gotta be a thankless >job, and you had a pretty long tenure. Thanks. :-) If you are going to eat the bread, you should bake once in a while, if asked. I may have burned the loaf a few times, but at least I gave it the old college try.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.