Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Unfair Prejudice Against Computers?

Author: Graham Laight

Date: 15:19:18 01/04/00

Go up one level in this thread

On January 04, 2000 at 13:17:14, Albert Silver wrote:

>Why would doubling the speed make much of a difference in 40/2? It isn't
>bullheaded, it's logical. So far I believe it is capable of PERFORMING at 2500
>against WEAKER opposition. I am not convinced it will perform the same against
>Grandmasters. If it performs 2500 against 2300 players but 2300 against 2500
>players, it isn't playing at grandmaster strength.
>
>                                       Albert Silver

If the last sentence is possible then there's something seriously wrong with the
Elo rating system.

-g

• Re: Unfair Prejudice Against Computers? Albert Silver 15:37:12 01/04/00
  • Elo Rating System Funadamentally Flawed? Graham Laight 02:13:17 01/05/00
    • Re: Elo Rating System Funadamentally Flawed? Robert Hyatt 06:35:39 01/05/00
      • Re: Elo Rating System Funadamentally Flawed? Chris Carson 06:52:58 01/05/00
    • Re: Elo Rating System Funadamentally Flawed? Albert Silver 05:48:28 01/05/00
    • Re: Elo Rating System Funadamentally Flawed? blass uri 03:10:07 01/05/00
      • Re: Elo Rating System Funadamentally Flawed? O. Veli 00:11:31 01/07/00
        • Re: Elo Rating System Funadamentally Flawed? blass uri 00:40:46 01/07/00
      • Re: Elo Rating System Funadamentally Flawed? Graham Laight 04:46:28 01/05/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.