Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 17:31:19 01/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2000 at 15:53:29, Daniel Clausen wrote: >I can't test against other engines, since the Crafty version I use doesn't show >the >number of q-nodes and Hiarcs also doesn't. :( I believe Der Bringer does, and i'll test the position with that one someday. >Note that the numbers above were for the initial position though. And my >q-search only includes captures. (no checks, or other extensions in qsearch) After 1. h3 I get over 46%. And I don't do check extensions nor anything else either. Hmmm... >For the position (7 plies) > 2rr2k1/1b3ppp/pb2p3/1p2P3/1P2BPnq/P1N3P1/1B2Q2P/R4R1K/ b - - This is from LCTII, right ? >I get: >#nodes=2'809'852 >#q=545'239 [19%] I get 48.60%. >(Of course without finding the winning move Rxc3) >Hm.. it's more likely that I count q-nodes also different than other people >though. :)) \begin{proud_mode} MINE DOES ! AND CRAFTY DOESNT ON THE SAME SYSTEM ! \end{proud_mode} Whew...that felt good ;) >int search(int ply, int maxPly, ...) [...] Looks ok to me... [...] >but I'd rather fail-high after the 5th than not at all. You are right. I forgot about the fact that whether your current node fails high is dependent on the move ordering of the nodes higher up in the tree...oops. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.