Author: pavel
Date: 20:47:51 01/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2000 at 23:26:15, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On January 04, 2000 at 22:14:18, pavel wrote:
>
>>hi guys :))
>> this is the second time i am posting the same message.....because the
>>first time no one replied......probably because it was holiday season at that
>>time. well this was my post (almost the same).........
>>
>> I am doing this test (if you cal it test).....i am letting crafty analyse
>>100s of gm......IM.......and computer games.......and i am giving it 1hr to
>>analyze each game......as a result its position.lrn is increasing along with its
>>book.lrn......now my question is will this by any chance increase the positional
>>knowledge of crafty.....and as a result refine its playing strength?
>
>
>if you are using "annotate" then no learning is done. So I am not sure
>what you are seeing there. The only time learning is enabled is in real
>games, where you make a move and the computer makes a move. In analysis
>mode, no learning occurs. In annotate, no learning occurs...
>
>
>
>
>>
>>Lets ask it differant way...(yeah yeah i have read the crafty.doc...i know you
>>will suggest that;) )....what will the differance in performance of two craftys
>>one with a big position.lrn and book.lrn(along with book).........and the other
>>with just the opening book......???
>>
>>someone (specially hyaat) answer pls
>>
>>pavel :)))))).............oh !! me god i missed my nap????
hi hyaat,
well i set it in to analyzing mode under CDB database program......and
after each analyze the position.lrn seems to increase by few "kb"......and
opening.lrn......very little. thus position.lrn or book.lrn really increase the
playing strength of crafty?
pavel ;))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.