Author: James Swafford
Date: 07:09:24 01/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2000 at 18:09:27, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 04, 2000 at 17:58:13, James Swafford wrote: > >>I suspect you're just trying to get the ball rolling >>here, and I don't blame you. I think it best, though, >>to mail in nominees to Steve. > >Doesn't someone need to second them? It seems to me a bit of discussion of the >topic might be good. I don't recall how it went, but if two or more nominated the same person, you could consider that a second. > >>Just like last time, each nominee should have a >>week or so to accept or decline. Finally, place >>the accepting nominees on a ballot and put it >>to a vote. > >Whatever the procedure was last time should be fine. I don't recall exactly how >the whole thing went step by step. > >>That aside, let me say "well done" to you, >>Bruce and KD. I know it's gotta be a thankless >>job, and you had a pretty long tenure. Thanks. :-) > >If you are going to eat the bread, you should bake once in a while, if asked. I >may have burned the loaf a few times, but at least I gave it the old college >try.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.