Author: Chessfun
Date: 15:09:01 01/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2000 at 11:56:51, Dan Kiski wrote:
>On January 05, 2000 at 23:39:38, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On January 05, 2000 at 23:23:10, Chessfun wrote:
>>
>>>On January 05, 2000 at 22:52:41, Imran Hendley wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 05, 2000 at 22:11:00, Chessfun wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I didn't mean to imply that I'm really good by saying I beat it 25 times
>>>>straight. GNUChess just played very weakly IMO, many times I would be up a minor
>>>>piece going into the endgame. It seemed to lose a lot of material on pins
>>>>especially. Maybe my style of play is just suited to beat GNUChess... I have no
>>>>such luck against Crafty and other strong Winboard programs.
>>>>
>>><snipped>
>>>I could be wrong I just beat it a few 3 min games it don't seem to strong when
>>>under pressure.
>>>
>>>[Event "Computer chess game"]
>>>[Site "MINE"]
>>>[Date "2000.01.05"]
>>>[Round "-"]
>>>[White "User"]
>>>[Black "GNUChess"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>[TimeControl "180"]
>>>
>>>1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. e3 Nf6 4. f4 e6 5. Nf3 Ne4 6. Bd3 Bb4+ 7. Bd2 Nxd2 8.
>>>Nbxd2 dxc4 9. Bxc4 c5 10. a3 Bxd2+ 11. Qxd2 cxd4 12. Qxd4 O-O 13. O-O Nc6
>>>14. Qc3 f6 15. g4 Qc7 16. Rf2 Rd8 17. Rg2 Bd7 18. g5 f5 19. h4 Rac8 20. h5
>>>Qa5 21. b4 Nxb4 22. h6 gxh6 23. gxh6+ Kf7 24. Qg7+ Ke8 25. Ng5 Bc6 26. Qf7# Qf7#
>>>{White mates} 1-0
>
>
>Humans beating comps yeah sure.
>I read in this thread| by Andrew.
>
>I know of two active gnuchess accounts on ICC:
>Zippy is GNUChess 4.0.pl77 and it has a blitz rating
>of 2259 on a 600MHz Alpha. GnuChess is version 5.0 and
>it has a blitz rating of 2508 on a 500 MHz PIII.
>Andrew
>
>How is this possible. Humans cannot beat computers,
>specially at 3 min/game. where the GNU is somewhere
>from 2259 to 2508 and you said you were only 2100.
>Imran seys he is 1700 and wins it i don't believe it.:)
>
>No way a computer plays 20 qh5, the move is a loser (it) losses.:)
>
This debate of computer programs beating humans is one that has been going on
here for weeks. As far as 20......Qa5 not h5 why not get the program and try it
yourself !!.
>
>>>
>>>Seems to fall for these type of attacks all the time.
>>>Thanks.
>>
2>>I especially like this one !!
>>[Event "Computer chess game"]
>>[Site "MINE"]
>>[Date "2000.01.05"]
>>[Round "-"]
>>[White "User"]
>>[Black "GNUChess"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[TimeControl "180"]
>>
>>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. f4 Nc6 4. e3 Ne4 5. Nf3 Bb4+ 6. Bd2 Nxd2 7. Nbxd2 d5
>>8. a3 Be7 9. Bd3 Bd7 10. O-O Rb8 11. g4 h5 12. g5 O-O 13. Nh4 g6 14. Nxg6
>>fxg6 15. Bxg6 e5 16. Qxh5 Rf5 17. Qh7+ Kf8 18. Qh8#
>>{White mates} 1-0
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>
>No computer would have played 11 h5 or 15 e5 when kg7 is =.:)
>
>
>Dan Kiski.
Again download the program and try it, set the time at 3 minutes and make sure
you make all those first 10 moves within 15 seconds, if the program goes for
another line then try again till it plays this one, then when you get to move 11
and move 15 you can post a little opps SORRY I WAS WRONG !!.
Note: I did try this line a few times and sometimes it goes for Kg7, I think the
key was deciding when I played 13. Nh4 that I was going to take at g6 after it
played the expected 13......g6, and would follow with 15. Bxg6 and therefore
playing the moves immediately. For some reason it don't seem to think very long
before its reply after Bxg6. Ohhh almost forgot. Then after you did it post the
opps SORRY I WAS WRONG TWICE!!.
Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.