Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: FICS vs ICC

Author: Peter Kappler

Date: 20:55:35 01/06/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 06, 2000 at 23:30:03, James Robertson wrote:

>On January 06, 2000 at 22:34:08, Peter Kappler wrote:
>
>>On January 06, 2000 at 21:58:35, Bango wrote:
>>
>>>On January 06, 2000 at 20:03:52, Amir Ban wrote:
>>>
>>>>What made you think it's a pay-site ?
>>>>
>>>>Amir
>>>
>>>Hello Amir,
>>>
>>>Once Klub membership grows Klub dues will be attempted !
>>>
>>>if and that's a big IF, Garry is monetarily satisfied with just the advertising
>>>logo dollars on the site, I do not have a problem with that.
>>>
>>>But......
>>>
>>>I find it rather interesting that none of the programmers has attempted to
>>>justify playing their programs on a pay site, when they could just as easily do
>>>the same thing at FICS.....
>>>
>>
>>
>>Actually, automated computer accounts can play on ICC for free.  (Excluding
>>Crafty clones)
>>
>
>Really? Can I get a computer account without buying a regular account?
>
>James
>


I think it used to be this way, but now I'm pretty sure you must at least have
one paid account to be eligible for the free account.  :-(

On the bright side, they do offer student discounts.

--Peter




>
>>That being said, ICC gets my money for three reasons:
>>
>>1) The quantity and quality of the opponents is much better.
>>2) ICC members tend to be better behaved than FICS members.
>>3) Blitzin is a wonderful interface.
>>
>>I think $50/yr is incredibly cheap for the quality of service ICC provides.  It
>>works out to a few pennies an hour if you're a chess junkie.  ;-)
>>
>>--Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.