Author: Tina Long
Date: 22:01:33 01/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2000 at 06:45:16, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On January 05, 2000 at 21:59:22, Tina Long wrote: > >>On January 05, 2000 at 13:39:25, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >> >>>Hi Tony! >>> I wonder why this match is 42 games long instead of the usual 40. >>>José. > >I had played 39 games before the last overnight session. In that session I got >three games. There's no point in deleting two of them is there? 98% Agree. 2% if the last two games were 1-1 it's cool, but if Fritz converted a 19-21 to a 21-21 with a 2-0 then...dunno, for a 1 in 4 chance in 2% of my concern I don't care. >Against weaker opponents we usually play 20 games matches. This is a very good compromise. >On the Fritz 3 result >the tester might have been away during the weekend having a session going. > I was commenting here on the 10:1 result and how "floggings" are statistically bad. >Tony > Thanks Tony, please don't think I was critisising SSDF proceedures, I was simply dreaming a little on one of my favourite number-hobbies. I've been a big fan of SSDF since the earliest ICCA Journals. Ha ha, there'll be a new SSDF list out soon!!!! Hi guys, Tina Long
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.