Author: Graham Laight
Date: 07:57:55 01/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2000 at 10:27:06, Chessfun wrote: >On January 07, 2000 at 10:15:10, Graham Laight wrote: > >>On January 07, 2000 at 05:35:35, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>Tiger beat Century 12-8, +6 -2 =12. Games will be posted this evening on >>>http://www.computerschach.de/tourn/ >>> >>>Enrique >> >>Congratulations to Tiger for an excellent score! >> >>This result is bad news for those who wish to put forward the argument that the >>Rebel Century vs GM series gives us a good picture of the strength of today's >>top programs, I'm afraid. >> >>-g > >Please elaborate how a 20 game match is any basis for comparison.? > >Please explain how this match at 40 moves in 40 minutes between these >two computer programs has any relationship to Rebel Century v GM Series 40 moves >in two hours??. > >How can any one match between two programs, allow a claim of a is better than b >therefore a would do better against GM's.??? especially with the time control >issue????. >Thanks. Agreed - it doesn't prove very much. All it does is imply that Tiger is a little stronger than Century. I just think that those who advocate using the Century V GM series as a guide to top computer strength would have been happier to read that Century had won the game 12-8, rather than losing it by that margin. -g
This page took 0.22 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.