Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: LG2000 v 2.0 poor performance on tactical test

Author: Steve Maughan

Date: 02:25:55 01/08/00

I have a collection of 190 tactical positions that I enjoy using to test the
strength of new programs.  I was amazed that the new Little Goliath 2000 v 2.0
was by far the worst overall performer, only scoring 66/190.  Interestingly, the
program had the best scores for quite a few positions.  So it would seem that
even in the area of tactics LG2000 v 2 still has some gaping holes and does not
compete too well with the big boys!

The results are as follows

Nimzo 7.32-127MB/450 MHz Pentium 2 Solves 126
Crafty 16.15-111MB/450 MHz Pentium II Solves 125
Fritz 5.32-111MB/450 MHz Pentium II Solves 122
Junior 5.0-111MB/450 MHz Pentium II Solves 122
Fritz 6.00-128MB/450 MHz Pentium 2 Solves 118
Junior 6.0-128MB/450 MHz Pentium 2 Solves 115
Hiarcs 7.32-64MB/450 MHz Pentium II Solves 113
LGoliath 2000 2.0-128MB/450 MHz Pentium 2 Solves 66

Regards

Steve Maughan

• Re: LG2000 v 2.0 poor performance on tactical test Côme 05:03:04 01/08/00
  • Re: LG2000 v 2.0 poor performance on tactical test Steve Maughan 07:03:41 01/08/00
    • Re: LG2000 v 2.0 poor performance on tactical test Mike S. 13:34:25 01/08/00
      • Re: LG2000 v 2.0 poor performance on tactical test Steve Maughan 06:11:46 01/09/00
        • Re: LG2000 v 2.0 poor performance on tactical test Mike S. 12:29:07 01/09/00
          • Re: LG2000 v 2.0 poor performance on tactical test Steve Maughan 13:00:10 01/09/00
    • Re: LG2000 v 2.0 poor performance on tactical test Côme 08:56:54 01/08/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.