Author: Côme
Date: 05:03:04 01/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2000 at 05:25:55, Steve Maughan wrote: >I have a collection of 190 tactical positions that I enjoy using to test the >strength of new programs. I was amazed that the new Little Goliath 2000 v 2.0 >was by far the worst overall performer, only scoring 66/190. Interestingly, the >program had the best scores for quite a few positions. So it would seem that >even in the area of tactics LG2000 v 2 still has some gaping holes and does not >compete too well with the big boys! > >The results are as follows > >Nimzo 7.32-127MB/450 MHz Pentium 2 Solves 126 >Crafty 16.15-111MB/450 MHz Pentium II Solves 125 >Fritz 5.32-111MB/450 MHz Pentium II Solves 122 >Junior 5.0-111MB/450 MHz Pentium II Solves 122 >Fritz 6.00-128MB/450 MHz Pentium 2 Solves 118 >Junior 6.0-128MB/450 MHz Pentium 2 Solves 115 >Hiarcs 7.32-64MB/450 MHz Pentium II Solves 113 >LGoliath 2000 2.0-128MB/450 MHz Pentium 2 Solves 66 > >Regards > >Steve Maughan Hello Steve, Have you set the option combination ON ? Best Regards Alexandre Côme
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.