Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 00:05:08 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 02:00:19, Chessfun wrote: >>Testing for interest, enjoyment, is the same as fun. >> >That statement is utter crap !!. If someone uses one word you just cannot >substitute another than you see as equal. Okay that is fine, then if your tests were not for fun, they were serious, then I say that your testing methods and the games you played give little information as to the strength of the Josh personality, very little useful information. Since it was not tested against the default, and there is no set value for the strength of CM6666, then no matter who won the strength is still unknown, I find you games you played for serious tested to be of little value. You are the first person to want to test something cause they are interested and not have any fun doing it. Playing games for interest or fun is the same thing in the end, a form of enjoyment. But lets face it, you played for interest and fun, the two go together, well they do with everyone I know. Plus why the name change ? Did you say things back then to get your reputation lowered amount fellow members and wanted to make a new start ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.