Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 00:27:42 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2000 at 18:20:18, Christophe Theron wrote: > >I did not expect Tiger to be the fastest. > >How much hash tables have you used? This position is rather sensitive to the >amount of hash table (it's natural as it is an endgame with reduced material). > >Actually I have just realized that Tiger solves it faster with 8Mb hash: 39 >seconds with 8Mb, 1m12s with 16Mb, and 28s with 32Mb hash tables (new record?). >The 16Mb result is an accident, it happens from time to time. Results on a K6-2 >450MHz. > >Genius5 DOS is handicapped as the version I have, which was provided together >with G5 Windows, cannot use more 384Kb. > >I suppose you have tried Genius5 Windows with a decent amount of hash tables? > > > Christophe Nimzo7.32 with 32MB hash on a P3-450 takes 11 seconds. With 16MB hash 26 seconds, with 8MB hash 15 seconds and with 64MB 38 seconds. Ernst-J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.