Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:19:42 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 03:27:42, Ernst Walet wrote:
>On January 08, 2000 at 18:20:18, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>
>>I did not expect Tiger to be the fastest.
>>
>>How much hash tables have you used? This position is rather sensitive to the
>>amount of hash table (it's natural as it is an endgame with reduced material).
>>
>>Actually I have just realized that Tiger solves it faster with 8Mb hash: 39
>>seconds with 8Mb, 1m12s with 16Mb, and 28s with 32Mb hash tables (new record?).
>>The 16Mb result is an accident, it happens from time to time. Results on a K6-2
>>450MHz.
>>
>>Genius5 DOS is handicapped as the version I have, which was provided together
>>with G5 Windows, cannot use more 384Kb.
>>
>>I suppose you have tried Genius5 Windows with a decent amount of hash tables?
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>
>Nimzo7.32 with 32MB hash on a P3-450 takes 11 seconds. With 16MB hash 26
>seconds, with 8MB hash 15 seconds and with 64MB 38 seconds.
>
>Ernst-J.
Very good solution times! New world record (on this position)!
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.