Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:46:35 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 12:19:42, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 09, 2000 at 03:27:42, Ernst Walet wrote: > >>On January 08, 2000 at 18:20:18, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>> >>>I did not expect Tiger to be the fastest. >>> >>>How much hash tables have you used? This position is rather sensitive to the >>>amount of hash table (it's natural as it is an endgame with reduced material). >>> >>>Actually I have just realized that Tiger solves it faster with 8Mb hash: 39 >>>seconds with 8Mb, 1m12s with 16Mb, and 28s with 32Mb hash tables (new record?). >>>The 16Mb result is an accident, it happens from time to time. Results on a K6-2 >>>450MHz. >>> >>>Genius5 DOS is handicapped as the version I have, which was provided together >>>with G5 Windows, cannot use more 384Kb. >>> >>>I suppose you have tried Genius5 Windows with a decent amount of hash tables? >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >> >>Nimzo7.32 with 32MB hash on a P3-450 takes 11 seconds. With 16MB hash 26 >>seconds, with 8MB hash 15 seconds and with 64MB 38 seconds. >> >>Ernst-J. > > >Very good solution times! New world record (on this position)! > > > Christophe Nimzo !! never tried him before: Cel 433 Nimzo 732 = 25 secs 8 mb hash 2nd test 25 secs. Nimzo 732 = 30 secs 16 mb hash 2nd test 30 secs. Nimzo 732 = 24 secs 32 mb hash 2nd test 24 secs. My test shows Nimzo holds f6 for a few seconds between 8-18 then switches to kxg2 before switching back again to f6 and holding. 1. f6 depths to 11/28 1. Kxg2 depths fr 11/28 to 13/29 1. f6 depths fr 13/29 Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.