Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 16:30:43 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 19:01:07, Daniel Clausen wrote: >Hi > >On January 09, 2000 at 18:40:34, Amir Ban wrote: > >>On January 09, 2000 at 18:21:53, James Robertson wrote: > >[snip] > >>I think Stefan MK has a fine program, but you have to be pretty biased to read >>here a specific attack on Shredder. > >I think he referred to the sentence "[Shredder] achieved the title mainly by >playing the endgame better than its competitors." While this sentence contains >not a direct attack vs Shredder, it certainly sounds like "If it wouldn't be for >the good endgame, Shredder would be beaten by the other programs." I disagree. This sentence says literally that Shredder's endings is what made the difference, not that it plays an inferior middlegame. I read comments in this same direction made by other people that speak highly of Shredder 4. Enrique >Or a similar sentence for an other engine would be: "Tiger scores so good >because of his opening book" :-)) > >Kinds regards, > -sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.