Author: Chessfun
Date: 22:40:22 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2000 at 00:25:17, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 08, 2000 at 13:20:12, Chessfun wrote: > >>On January 08, 2000 at 12:17:51, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >><snipped> >> >>>I see that this position raises very little interest, or maybe top programs are >>>not able to solve it? Actually I know that Genius5 solves it pretty fast (maybe >>>faster than Tiger, I'm not sure). >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >>To answer the first post. I don't have a favorite program you won't >>send it to me !!. >> >>Genius 5. Takes 3 mins 25 secs on Cel 433 to post a + score for 1. f6. > >Genius 3 takes 3:38 on a K6-2/350. > > A.S. For interest I tried Genius 3 also !!. Cel 433 Genius 3 takes 3:39 depth 14-26. Thanks. > > >>Genius 6. Takes 4 mins 12 secs to post a + score for 1. f6. >>It looks at 1. f6. for first 44 secs showing - then switches to Kxg2 >>before going back to 1. f6. >> >>CM6K default no solve after 12 min 19 secs 42,000,000 nodes. >> >>Hiarcs 7.32 Looks at 1. f6. for first up to first 2 mins showing - >>then switches to Kxg2 before I gave up at depth 15/30 approx 7 mins >>still showing Kxg2. >> >>Fritz 6 No luck after 5 mins 1. Kxg2. >> >>I had tried this on other softwares, Tiger is the fastest I have heard. >> >> >>Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.