Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 23:18:33 01/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 23:52:48, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >btw, suposing that if you do a nullmove and if you get mated you do a 1 ply of >extension , have happened to you that sometimes a continuation never get >finished? had happened to me various times especially if the mate is with a move In my program, it is possible for a null move to send me straight to the quiescence search; the check extension is never "activated." If my program is in check in the quiescence search, it will search all legal moves, so it's like another ply of full width. >catalogued as a losing capture... btw too, has been said that killer captures >have not worked good, but losing captures that causes a cut off should be >considered as a killer capture? doesnt look bad. If you're talking about the killer move heuristic, that should only be done for non-captures. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.