Author: Charles Milton Ling
Date: 00:11:37 01/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2000 at 03:01:43, hgkjhg wrote: >No one on this board is even remotely as talented as kasparov. And Deep Blue >was probably a fake. It still hasn't released a log, which is easy to fabricate >anyway. Kasparov want h6 in the last game, because he knew that Deep Blue would >not containg bad lines in its book, and it couldn't possibly come up with the >move all by itself. Deep Blue also lost to fritz3. Before more qualified people take over: Kasparov probably knows less about computer chess than 90 % of the people here. (Yes, I am firmly in the 10 %). That is what is being discussed. Deep Blue a fake? Like the Turk? The last two sentences are strange: Kasparov played (if I may translate "want" this way) h6 because Deep Blue did not have it in its book? It did, of course, but it would not have been necessary. If I play h6 at my club in that position, my colleagues will suggest I have had a beer too many. The connection with Fritz 3 is strange and, I venture, completely inaccurate. Typing is fun, yes? Charley
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.