Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 11:46:21 01/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 19:30:43, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On January 09, 2000 at 19:01:07, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>Hi >> >>On January 09, 2000 at 18:40:34, Amir Ban wrote: >> >>>On January 09, 2000 at 18:21:53, James Robertson wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >>>I think Stefan MK has a fine program, but you have to be pretty biased to read >>>here a specific attack on Shredder. >> >>I think he referred to the sentence "[Shredder] achieved the title mainly by >>playing the endgame better than its competitors." While this sentence contains >>not a direct attack vs Shredder, it certainly sounds like "If it wouldn't be for >>the good endgame, Shredder would be beaten by the other programs." > >I disagree. This sentence says literally that Shredder's endings is what made >the difference, not that it plays an inferior middlegame. I read comments in >this same direction made by other people that speak highly of Shredder 4. > >Enrique I also took that statement to be a compliment to Shredder's endgame ability. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.