Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:24:38 01/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2000 at 16:06:06, Ed Schröder wrote:
>Very good Thorsten. You have my admiration.
>
>Ed
after the dozens of ironic and sarcastic statements following
the posting of the first game i am a little unsure
how you meant it ed :-)))
where are your smileys ? :-)))
whatever.
games runs and diep has NOW book enough, even in petroff-defense.
we are in 8th move and still diep is in book, meanwhile tiger
has NO book.
Hope tiger is not running into a trap from book.
that would in my opinions cause again dozens of posts complaining
and suggesting there is a kind of cheating... oh yes.
i have always asked myself why jaap van den herik is
having so much problems deciding wise and cool, now i feel by own
experience why it is so difficult to defend your point
of views concerning your decisions in public :-)))
sorry jaap :-))
Oh - diep computes in move 9 !
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. d4 d5 6. Bd3
Be7 7. o-o o-o 8. Re1 {last book-move diep} Nc6 9. *
so diep evaluates this +0.35 meanwhile tiger says
-0.18.
May the best program win !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.