Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 14:39:16 01/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2000 at 16:24:38, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On January 10, 2000 at 16:06:06, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>Very good Thorsten. You have my admiration.
>>
>>Ed
>
>after the dozens of ironic and sarcastic statements following
>the posting of the first game i am a little unsure
>how you meant it ed :-)))
That you are willing to replay the game. Not many others would do
that, I assume.
>where are your smileys ? :-)))
No smileys after Rebel's loss against GM Sherbakov.
>whatever.
>
>games runs and diep has NOW book enough, even in petroff-defense.
>
>we are in 8th move and still diep is in book, meanwhile tiger
>has NO book.
>
>Hope tiger is not running into a trap from book.
>that would in my opinions cause again dozens of posts complaining
>and suggesting there is a kind of cheating... oh yes.
>i have always asked myself why jaap van den herik is
>having so much problems deciding wise and cool, now i feel by own
>experience why it is so difficult to defend your point
>of views concerning your decisions in public :-)))
>
>sorry jaap :-))
Pah!
:-)
Ed
>Oh - diep computes in move 9 !
>
>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. d4 d5 6. Bd3
>Be7 7. o-o o-o 8. Re1 {last book-move diep} Nc6 9. *
>
>so diep evaluates this +0.35 meanwhile tiger says
>-0.18.
>
>May the best program win !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.