Author: Jeff Lischer
Date: 19:10:27 01/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2000 at 20:23:26, Stephen A. Boak wrote: >On January 09, 2000 at 14:28:59, Chris Carson wrote: > >>On January 09, 2000 at 14:19:43, Wybe Koopmans wrote: >> >>>On January 09, 2000 at 11:25:25, Chris Carson wrote: >>> >>>>Program Hardware Perf. Opp Games >>>>Rebel AMD K6II-300 2427 2427 2 >>>>Rebel AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 3 >>>>Rebel AMD K6II-450 2595 2795 2 >>>>Rebel AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 3 >>>>Rebel Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 5 * >>>> >>>>* - 1 game (Hoffman) lost due to HW problems, >>>> PR 2552 without this game !! >>>> >>>>Rebel PII-350 2432 2432 2 >>>>Rebel PII-400 2466 2466 1 >>>>Rebel PII-450 2185 2585 1 >>>>Rebel PIII-500 2866 2466 1 >>>> >>>>Source: Rebel web page: http://www.rebel.nl/edindex.htm >>>> >>>>Team Fritz, Ferrett, Shredder, Silkchess, Junior vs >>>>Team Lutz, van Wely, Sokolov, Vaganian, Alterman >>>> (2600) (2635) (2620) (2630) (2625) = 2622 >>>> >>>>Programs score 2.5/5 for 2622 TPR at WCCC 1999 !! >>>> >>>>Source: WCCC 1999 web page: http://www.uni-paderborn.de/~wccc99/ >>>> >>>>Performance calculated using web: http://maskeret.com/mecca/ >>>> >>>>Raw data: >>>> >>>>Player FIDE Rebel Hardware TPR Opp >>>>Sakalauskas 2450 0 AMD K6II-300 2427 2427 >>>>Zapolskis 2399 1 AMD K6II-300 2427 2427 >>> >>>Hardware was: PII 350 Mhz >>> >>>>Russek 2398 1 AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 >>>>Russek 2398 0.5 AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 >>>>Russek 2398 0.5 AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 >>>>Anand 2795 0.5 AMD K6II-450 2595 2795 >>>>Anand 2795 0 AMD K6II-450 2595 2795 >>>>Rohde 2585 0.5 AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 >>>>Ruzele 2515 0.5 AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 >>>>Zagorskis 2486 1 AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 >>>>Baburin 2593 0.5 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>Sherbakov 2552 0 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>Scherbakov 2541 1 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>Sorin 2524 0.5 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>Hoffman 2501 0 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>Krivonosov 2432 0.5 PII-350 2432 2432 >>>>Krivonosov 2432 0.5 PII-350 2432 2432 >>> >>>Hardware was: AMD K6II-300 >>> >>>>Grabliauskas 2466 0.5 PII-400 2466 2466 >>>>Rohde 2585 0 PII-450 2185 2585 >>>>Grabliauskas 2466 1 PIII-500 2866 2466 >>>> >>>>Best Regards, >>>>Chris Carson >>> >>>Best regards, Wybe >> >>Rebel page: http://www.rebel.nl/gm.htm >> >>Shows the hardware I posted. :) >> >>Are you saying the Rebel page is wrong? >> >>Best Regards, >>Chris Carson > >Hi Chris, > I have been keeping similar records, in Excel spreadsheet, for some time. I >did not, however, record the hardware types (as yet). > 1. After we get the list settled, agreed by all (Rebel Team and critics), I >would like to capture also the color played by Rebel in each game. > 2. Then, I will verify the the web-based rating calculations you have posted >by using my own manual check. > 3. I already have spreadsheet calculations plus an Excel graph that show >Opponent Rtg, Rebel TPR (each game), Rebel running average TPR (all games), >Rebel moving ave TPR (last 5 games), Rebel moving ave TPR (last 10 games). > 4. I'd like to also graph Rebel TPR info for: A) types of Hardware, as well as >B) Color (White/Black results), since both are interesting stats. > The calculations on types of hardware may (if enough games are played) allow a >test of the generally accepted principal that programs play 50-70 points better >for each doubling of CPU speed, to see if that principal applies to comp-human >play based on Rebel 40/2 tests, and what the empirical figure is in this >instance. > Thanks for the work published so far! > --Steve Boak Using all 21 games now played, I get a TPR of 2491 for Rebel. Is this what others are getting too? I notice above that the Grabliauskas game on the PIII-500 is accidently called a win for Rebel. I think it was actually a loss :( I asked Ed at the Rebel Board whether he thought the Hoffman game should be included and he feels that it should be included -- Hoffman won well played game and Rebel's hardware problems did not cause the loss. Earlier, Ed stated here at CCC that he felt the Russek games should also be included since they were played with same settings as in GM Challenge and were played with 40/2 time control.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.