Author: Roger
Date: 20:37:45 01/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
Then again, he knows he's the champ where humans are concerned, and he can play for the millions many times over during the next decade without playing Deep Blue again. But if he does play Deep Blue again, and he loses, doubt about whether he's the best dissolves, because the excuses are gone (he freaks out under the pressure, he just had an off tournament, etc), and now he's second best. That could throw a wrench into the millions that are GUARANTEED if he DOES NOT play Deep Blue. Why risk it? Roger On January 10, 2000 at 22:13:29, Luis E. Alvarado wrote: >On January 10, 2000 at 20:12:04, Carl McClain Morris, Jr. wrote: > >Agree, He is the champ and he calls the shots. Give him enough money and he will >agree to play anybody (seems too logical to be true) > > >>I think we would be world champions should give Gary Kasparov his due. All of a >>sudden the psuedo-psychologists come out of the wood work to analyse the >>greatest chess player of our time. If he were to have a rematch, I don't think >>he would lose. Just my opinion. >> >>C Morris
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.