Author: Harald Faber
Date: 21:58:33 01/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2000 at 18:15:30, Mark Young wrote: >On January 10, 2000 at 04:10:18, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On January 09, 2000 at 11:23:11, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On January 09, 2000 at 10:57:40, Charles Unruh wrote: >>> >>>>(Off Top)Leko Beats Khalifman 4.5 to 1.5 by winning game 6(Poor Khalifman) >>> >>>This shows the folly of crowning a World Champion with just one short >>>tournament....hello Shredder. >> >>So what would you suggest for programs? also candidate matches and so on as >>there have been for humans? Nice idea. :-) >> >>BTW Shredder *4* has already proved its strength! > >Yes it has, and it is not the strongest program. World Champion yes, but not the >strongest, as with Khalifman. It's to bad the Title World Champion has lost its >meaning in chess. I disagree. World Champion, who is called so or should be called so? The one who wins the World Championship, right? I do not see any word that says the World Champion MUST be the strongest player. There are many kinds of sports where the World Champion is NOT the rating list no.1.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.