Author: Lonnie Cook
Date: 22:07:07 01/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2000 at 23:37:45, Roger wrote: >Then again, he knows he's the champ where humans are concerned, and he can play >for the millions many times over during the next decade without playing Deep >Blue again. > >But if he does play Deep Blue again, and he loses, doubt about whether he's the >best dissolves, because the excuses are gone (he freaks out under the pressure, >he just had an off tournament, etc), and now he's second best. > >That could throw a wrench into the millions that are GUARANTEED if he DOES NOT >play Deep Blue. > >Why risk it? Yeah, how true and he was the one making allegations of cheating and that he wanted a rematch. He has opportunity to get the ball rolling and now he buckles! Funny thing is he was all gun-ho for rematch when Deep Blue was gonna be used for weather forecasting ... > >Roger > > >On January 10, 2000 at 22:13:29, Luis E. Alvarado wrote: > >>On January 10, 2000 at 20:12:04, Carl McClain Morris, Jr. wrote: >> >>Agree, He is the champ and he calls the shots. Give him enough money and he will >>agree to play anybody (seems too logical to be true) >> >> >>>I think we would be world champions should give Gary Kasparov his due. All of a >>>sudden the psuedo-psychologists come out of the wood work to analyse the >>>greatest chess player of our time. If he were to have a rematch, I don't think >>>he would lose. Just my opinion. >>> >>>C Morris
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.