Author: Chris Carson
Date: 05:05:33 01/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2000 at 22:10:27, Jeff Lischer wrote: >On January 09, 2000 at 20:23:26, Stephen A. Boak wrote: > >>On January 09, 2000 at 14:28:59, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>>On January 09, 2000 at 14:19:43, Wybe Koopmans wrote: >>> >>>>On January 09, 2000 at 11:25:25, Chris Carson wrote: >>>> >>>>>Program Hardware Perf. Opp Games >>>>>Rebel AMD K6II-300 2427 2427 2 >>>>>Rebel AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 3 >>>>>Rebel AMD K6II-450 2595 2795 2 >>>>>Rebel AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 3 >>>>>Rebel Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 5 * >>>>> >>>>>* - 1 game (Hoffman) lost due to HW problems, >>>>> PR 2552 without this game !! >>>>> >>>>>Rebel PII-350 2432 2432 2 >>>>>Rebel PII-400 2466 2466 1 >>>>>Rebel PII-450 2185 2585 1 >>>>>Rebel PIII-500 2866 2466 1 >>>>> >>>>>Source: Rebel web page: http://www.rebel.nl/edindex.htm >>>>> >>>>>Team Fritz, Ferrett, Shredder, Silkchess, Junior vs >>>>>Team Lutz, van Wely, Sokolov, Vaganian, Alterman >>>>> (2600) (2635) (2620) (2630) (2625) = 2622 >>>>> >>>>>Programs score 2.5/5 for 2622 TPR at WCCC 1999 !! >>>>> >>>>>Source: WCCC 1999 web page: http://www.uni-paderborn.de/~wccc99/ >>>>> >>>>>Performance calculated using web: http://maskeret.com/mecca/ >>>>> >>>>>Raw data: >>>>> >>>>>Player FIDE Rebel Hardware TPR Opp >>>>>Sakalauskas 2450 0 AMD K6II-300 2427 2427 >>>>>Zapolskis 2399 1 AMD K6II-300 2427 2427 >>>> >>>>Hardware was: PII 350 Mhz >>>> >>>>>Russek 2398 1 AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 >>>>>Russek 2398 0.5 AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 >>>>>Russek 2398 0.5 AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 >>>>>Anand 2795 0.5 AMD K6II-450 2595 2795 >>>>>Anand 2795 0 AMD K6II-450 2595 2795 >>>>>Rohde 2585 0.5 AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 >>>>>Ruzele 2515 0.5 AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 >>>>>Zagorskis 2486 1 AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 >>>>>Baburin 2593 0.5 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>Sherbakov 2552 0 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>Scherbakov 2541 1 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>Sorin 2524 0.5 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>Hoffman 2501 0 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>Krivonosov 2432 0.5 PII-350 2432 2432 >>>>>Krivonosov 2432 0.5 PII-350 2432 2432 >>>> >>>>Hardware was: AMD K6II-300 >>>> >>>>>Grabliauskas 2466 0.5 PII-400 2466 2466 >>>>>Rohde 2585 0 PII-450 2185 2585 >>>>>Grabliauskas 2466 1 PIII-500 2866 2466 >>>>> >>>>>Best Regards, >>>>>Chris Carson >>>> >>>>Best regards, Wybe >>> >>>Rebel page: http://www.rebel.nl/gm.htm >>> >>>Shows the hardware I posted. :) >>> >>>Are you saying the Rebel page is wrong? >>> >>>Best Regards, >>>Chris Carson >> >>Hi Chris, >> I have been keeping similar records, in Excel spreadsheet, for some time. I >>did not, however, record the hardware types (as yet). >> 1. After we get the list settled, agreed by all (Rebel Team and critics), I >>would like to capture also the color played by Rebel in each game. >> 2. Then, I will verify the the web-based rating calculations you have posted >>by using my own manual check. >> 3. I already have spreadsheet calculations plus an Excel graph that show >>Opponent Rtg, Rebel TPR (each game), Rebel running average TPR (all games), >>Rebel moving ave TPR (last 5 games), Rebel moving ave TPR (last 10 games). >> 4. I'd like to also graph Rebel TPR info for: A) types of Hardware, as well as >>B) Color (White/Black results), since both are interesting stats. >> The calculations on types of hardware may (if enough games are played) allow a >>test of the generally accepted principal that programs play 50-70 points better >>for each doubling of CPU speed, to see if that principal applies to comp-human >>play based on Rebel 40/2 tests, and what the empirical figure is in this >>instance. >> Thanks for the work published so far! >> --Steve Boak > >Using all 21 games now played, I get a TPR of 2491 for Rebel. Is this what >others are getting too? I notice above that the Grabliauskas game on the >PIII-500 is accidently called a win for Rebel. I think it was actually a loss :( > It is listed as a win on the Rebel board: http://www.rebel.nl/gm.htm 2 Virginijus Grabliauskas IM 2466 Pentium-III, 500 Mhz (white) 0 - 1 This puts the Rebel average a little higher. If this is incorrect, get Ed to let me know and change his information. Whatever Ed says, I will ofcourse concur with on this. :) Otherwise, your caclculations look correct. I did include the Hoffman as a win in my calculation above and just made a note about the hardware. IMHO: it was worth noting, but I will remove the note in future posts. :) Remarkable score though, especially when broken out by hardware. :) Best Regards, Chris Carson >I asked Ed at the Rebel Board whether he thought the Hoffman game should be >included and he feels that it should be included -- Hoffman won well played game >and Rebel's hardware problems did not cause the loss. Earlier, Ed stated here at >CCC that he felt the Russek games should also be included since they were played >with same settings as in GM Challenge and were played with 40/2 time control.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.