Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 08:14:36 01/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2000 at 08:05:33, Chris Carson wrote: >On January 10, 2000 at 22:10:27, Jeff Lischer wrote: > >>On January 09, 2000 at 20:23:26, Stephen A. Boak wrote: >> >>>On January 09, 2000 at 14:28:59, Chris Carson wrote: >>> >>>>On January 09, 2000 at 14:19:43, Wybe Koopmans wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 09, 2000 at 11:25:25, Chris Carson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Program Hardware Perf. Opp Games >>>>>>Rebel AMD K6II-300 2427 2427 2 >>>>>>Rebel AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 3 >>>>>>Rebel AMD K6II-450 2595 2795 2 >>>>>>Rebel AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 3 >>>>>>Rebel Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 5 * >>>>>> >>>>>>* - 1 game (Hoffman) lost due to HW problems, >>>>>> PR 2552 without this game !! >>>>>> >>>>>>Rebel PII-350 2432 2432 2 >>>>>>Rebel PII-400 2466 2466 1 >>>>>>Rebel PII-450 2185 2585 1 >>>>>>Rebel PIII-500 2866 2466 1 >>>>>> >>>>>>Source: Rebel web page: http://www.rebel.nl/edindex.htm >>>>>> >>>>>>Team Fritz, Ferrett, Shredder, Silkchess, Junior vs >>>>>>Team Lutz, van Wely, Sokolov, Vaganian, Alterman >>>>>> (2600) (2635) (2620) (2630) (2625) = 2622 >>>>>> >>>>>>Programs score 2.5/5 for 2622 TPR at WCCC 1999 !! >>>>>> >>>>>>Source: WCCC 1999 web page: http://www.uni-paderborn.de/~wccc99/ >>>>>> >>>>>>Performance calculated using web: http://maskeret.com/mecca/ >>>>>> >>>>>>Raw data: >>>>>> >>>>>>Player FIDE Rebel Hardware TPR Opp >>>>>>Sakalauskas 2450 0 AMD K6II-300 2427 2427 >>>>>>Zapolskis 2399 1 AMD K6II-300 2427 2427 >>>>> >>>>>Hardware was: PII 350 Mhz >>>>> >>>>>>Russek 2398 1 AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 >>>>>>Russek 2398 0.5 AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 >>>>>>Russek 2398 0.5 AMD K6III-400 2515 2398 >>>>>>Anand 2795 0.5 AMD K6II-450 2595 2795 >>>>>>Anand 2795 0 AMD K6II-450 2595 2795 >>>>>>Rohde 2585 0.5 AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 >>>>>>Ruzele 2515 0.5 AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 >>>>>>Zagorskis 2486 1 AMD K6III-600 2645 2528 >>>>>>Baburin 2593 0.5 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>>Sherbakov 2552 0 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>>Scherbakov 2541 1 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>>Sorin 2524 0.5 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>>Hoffman 2501 0 Kryo K6III-600 2470 2542 >>>>>>Krivonosov 2432 0.5 PII-350 2432 2432 >>>>>>Krivonosov 2432 0.5 PII-350 2432 2432 >>>>> >>>>>Hardware was: AMD K6II-300 >>>>> >>>>>>Grabliauskas 2466 0.5 PII-400 2466 2466 >>>>>>Rohde 2585 0 PII-450 2185 2585 >>>>>>Grabliauskas 2466 1 PIII-500 2866 2466 >>>>>> >>>>>>Best Regards, >>>>>>Chris Carson >>>>> >>>>>Best regards, Wybe >>>> >>>>Rebel page: http://www.rebel.nl/gm.htm >>>> >>>>Shows the hardware I posted. :) >>>> >>>>Are you saying the Rebel page is wrong? >>>> >>>>Best Regards, >>>>Chris Carson >>> >>>Hi Chris, >>> I have been keeping similar records, in Excel spreadsheet, for some time. I >>>did not, however, record the hardware types (as yet). >>> 1. After we get the list settled, agreed by all (Rebel Team and critics), I >>>would like to capture also the color played by Rebel in each game. >>> 2. Then, I will verify the the web-based rating calculations you have posted >>>by using my own manual check. >>> 3. I already have spreadsheet calculations plus an Excel graph that show >>>Opponent Rtg, Rebel TPR (each game), Rebel running average TPR (all games), >>>Rebel moving ave TPR (last 5 games), Rebel moving ave TPR (last 10 games). >>> 4. I'd like to also graph Rebel TPR info for: A) types of Hardware, as well as >>>B) Color (White/Black results), since both are interesting stats. >>> The calculations on types of hardware may (if enough games are played) allow a >>>test of the generally accepted principal that programs play 50-70 points better >>>for each doubling of CPU speed, to see if that principal applies to comp-human >>>play based on Rebel 40/2 tests, and what the empirical figure is in this >>>instance. >>> Thanks for the work published so far! >>> --Steve Boak >> >>Using all 21 games now played, I get a TPR of 2491 for Rebel. Is this what >>others are getting too? I notice above that the Grabliauskas game on the >>PIII-500 is accidently called a win for Rebel. I think it was actually a loss :( >> > >It is listed as a win on the Rebel board: >http://www.rebel.nl/gm.htm > >2 Virginijus Grabliauskas IM 2466 Pentium-III, 500 Mhz (white) 0 - 1 Rebel had white in this game see above. Rebel lost so the 0-1 is correct. Confusion over? Ed >This puts the Rebel average a little higher. > >If this is incorrect, get Ed to let me know and change his >information. Whatever Ed says, I will ofcourse concur with >on this. :) > >Otherwise, your caclculations look correct. I did include the >Hoffman as a win in my calculation above and just made a note >about the hardware. IMHO: it was worth noting, but I will >remove the note in future posts. :) > >Remarkable score though, especially when broken out by hardware. :) > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson > >>I asked Ed at the Rebel Board whether he thought the Hoffman game should be >>included and he feels that it should be included -- Hoffman won well played game >>and Rebel's hardware problems did not cause the loss. Earlier, Ed stated here at >>CCC that he felt the Russek games should also be included since they were played >>with same settings as in GM Challenge and were played with 40/2 time control.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.