Author: Graham Laight
Date: 09:59:33 01/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2000 at 21:34:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>I see what you are saying... >>> >>I did find this on the rebel site though... >> >>"Deep Blue - Kasparov the re-match of 1997 won by Deep Blue. >> >>In this famous position Gary Kasparov resigned while he could have a draw with >>Qe3! Like Gary for most computers this move is also very hard to find. >>Rebel 10.0 (normal) Qe3! not found after 13 plies and 30 minutes. >>Rebel 10.0 (anti-GM) Qe3 found at ply 12 at 7:22" >> >>looks like the anti-GM feature did find the move if I'm reading this right... >>> > >Aha.. now I understand. Crafty (at the time) found Qe3 easily. But it thought >it was losing. It never understood that the score was anywhere near 0.00. That >was the issue I was addressing. It is one thing to find the right move, another >to find the right move for the right reason. Kasparov said that the draw was >obvious after he looked at it and couldn't believe the computer had overlooked >it. He was wrong. The draw is over 60 plies into the future, not "a few". So how is it possible that within hours of the game, people from all over the world had found the draw with their PC based chess programs? -g
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.