Author: Charles Unruh
Date: 11:02:26 01/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2000 at 13:42:23, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 11, 2000 at 13:37:34, Charles Unruh wrote: > >>I have a friend who stuffed the voting box with 50 votes at twic to make Fischer >>come out as the best player of all time. That being said lets get some polls up >>on if chess programs are GM strength, And Keep _ _ _ _ y _ _ t from voting >>heheeh :). > >You have just accurately described the weakness of polls. They don't prove >anything. In fact, if instead of stuffing the box, he got 50 of his friends who >feel exactly as he does to vote, would anything be changed? I think that an attempt to stop internet stuffing from occurring would be to minimize the time that voting can occur say from 30 minutes to an hour. Cheaters need time to setup different emails, get different IPs change domains etc. That window is good enough, and enough people can show up to vote at that time. When you have a Kasparov-Anand game shown on icc nobody is late, or better a Sherbakov-Rebel game. So i think 30 minutes to an hour is sufficient. The time for the vote just needs to be announced. (Unruh Method) :) The only thing a >poll decides is how the people who voted feel about a topic. Yet their feelings >do not alter reality. [Indiana State Legislature & pi]. > >All that having been said, I think they are fun anyway. However, I think a >useful poll is one that has genuine value. For instance, "What features would >you like to see in a chess program?" "What is the most important feature of a >chess program?" and things of that nature can give developers direction in how >to design their product. And it can also help those who are selling the tools. > >Questions like "Who is the strongest chess player of all time?" are exactly akin >to "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?"
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.